Distributional Analysis of House GOP and Democratic Marriage Penalty Bills

February 11, 2000 03:44 PM | | Bookmark and Share

On Feb. 10, the House passed GOP-sponsored legislation to reduce the “marriage penalty,” the extra income taxes that a married couple pays compared to a similar income couple living outside of marriage. It rejected a Democratic alternative.

Effective in 2001, the House-passed plan would slightly boost the earned-income tax credit for couples and raise the married standard deduction to double the single amount. In addition, and most notably, the plan would increase the starting point for the 28 percent tax bracket for couples to double the single level.

Read the Full Report


    Want even more CTJ? Check us out on Twitter, Facebook, RSS, and Youtube!

Bush Tax Plan Takes Giant Bite Out of Social Security

February 4, 2000 12:59 PM | | Bookmark and Share

A more detailed analysis of the Bush plan is available in HTML or PDF format.


Related CTJ Publications:

The huge cost of the upper-income tax cut plan put forward by Texas Gov. George W. Bush would far exceed officially projected non-social-security budget surpluses over the next decade. A new analysis by Citizens for Tax Justice shows that as a result and despite Gov. Bush’s promise to protect Social Security, the Bush tax plan would raid as much as three-quarters of the ten-year projected Social Security surpluses.

Over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office projects budget surpluses, excluding Social Security, of $838

Effects of the Bush Tax Plan on Social Security, 2001-10
Surplus Projections (without Social Security):
A. CBO: adjust appropriations for inflation $ +838 billion
B. Adjust for inflation & population +399
C. Maintain share of the economy –14
Cost of Bush Tax Plan $ 1,779 billion
Projected Social Security Surplus $ +2,314 billion
Percentage of Social Security Surpluses used up by Bush Tax Plan
Appropriations Scenario A 41%
Appropriations Scenario B 60%
Appropriations Scenario C 78%

billion–assuming that discretionary appropriations will merely stay even with inflation. If one instead assumes that discretionary appropriations will keep up with population growth as well as inflation, these projected budget surpluses fall to only $399 billion. If, as is probably most likely, appropriations keep up with the economy, then the entire non-social-security surplus disappears.

Meanwhile, over their first nine years (fiscal 2002-10), the Bush tax cuts would cost $1.8 trillion (including $265 billion in added interest costs). As a result, over the next decade, the Bush tax cuts would far exceed all reasonable projections of upcoming non-social-security surpluses. That would require dipping deeply into the Social Security trust fund to pay for the Bush tax cuts. In fact, over the next decade, the Bush tax plan would use up between 41% and 78% of projected Social Security surpluses.

“Gov. Bush may somehow think he can have a giant tax cut for the well-off and protect Social Security at the same time, but the figures show he’s simply wrong,” said CTJ director Robert S. McIntyre.


    Want even more CTJ? Check us out on Twitter, Facebook, RSS, and Youtube!