March 2, 2001 11:44 AM | Permalink |
On March 1, the House Ways and Means Committee approved the biggest item in President George W. Bush’s tax plan, a sharp reduction in personal income tax rates. Republicans and Democrats on the Committee generally agreed on the size of the tax cuts for all but the richest taxpayers. But they sharply differed on the tax breaks for the best-off one percent, and thus on the overall size of the tax cut.
The GOP plan, which passed on a party-line vote, offers the top income group an average tax cut of more than $28,000 a year once the plan is fully in place. In contrast, the Democratic plan would limit its tax breaks for the top one percent to $737 a year.
|Two Competing Income Tax Cuts|
|Income Group||Average Tax Cut||% of Tax Cut||Average Tax Cut||% of Tax Cut|
|Lowest 20%||$ –41||1.3%||$ –81||4.4%|
|ALL||$ –633||100.0%||$ –366||100.0%|
|Bottom 60%||$ –175||16.5%||$ –179||29.1%|
Under the Republican income tax plan, the wealthiest one percent would get 44.3 percent of the total income tax reductions. Under the Democratic plan, the top one percent would get two percent of the total tax breaks.
As a result, the GOP plan would total $958 billion over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. Including $258 billion in added interest on the national debt, the total cost would be $1.2 trillion over ten years. The Democrats’ alternative would cost only about half as much, even though the tax reductions for all but the top income group would be almost identical–or, in the case of the poorest taxpayers, larger–than under the GOP plan.
“The battle lines have been drawn,” said Robert S. McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice. “Both sides agree on tax cuts for middle-income families. But one side believes the wealthy are especially needy–apparently compared to almost any other public priority.”
The GOP income tax rate reductions are identical to those proposed by President Bush, with a portion of the cuts accelerated to tax year 2001. Under the plan, the top income tax rates, now 36 percent and 39.6 percent, would be reduced to 33 percent; the current 28 percent and 31 percent rates would be reduced to 25 percent; the current 15 percent rate would be continued; and a new bottom rate of 10 percent would apply to the first $12,000 in taxable income for couples and $6,000 for singles. The rate reductions would be phased in, and would take full effect in 2006.
The Democratic income tax cuts include a new 12% tax bracket, applicable to the first $20,000 in taxable income for couples, $16,000 for single parents and $10,000 for single taxpayers without children; an increase in the standard deduction for couples to double the single amount; and enhancements to the earned-income tax credit for moderate-income working families. The provisions would be phased in, and would be fully effective in 2003.
The GOP plan envisions a vast expansion in the number of taxpayers in the top fifth of the income distribution (but not the top one percent) who would have to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, by 2008, some 24 million taxpayers would pay the complicated “AMT” under the GOP plan. This result is very unlikely to be politically acceptable, but it reduces the apparent cost of the GOP income tax rate cuts by almost a quarter over ten years.
When fully in place, the Bush income tax rate cuts would represent about half the total cost of Bush’s proposed tax cuts, apparently leaving another trillion dollars or so in Bush tax cuts still awaiting congressional action.